Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyers Get Results

The following is a sample of the verdicts and settlements we have obtained for our clients. The results in each of these cases reflect the law as applied to the unique facts and circumstances of each case and may not be typical or indicative of the results that we may obtain for you given the specific facts of your legal issue.

$10,000,000 – Construction accident settlement during trial

$3,800,000—Truck Collision Wrongful Death verdict

$3,000,000  – Car Accident Settlement

$2,970,000 – Auto accident verdict

$2,100,000 – Car accident settlement during trial

$2,100,000 – Settlement during trial for product liability case

$2,000.000 – Car accident settlement

$1,850,000– Settlement in collision with police car case resulting in death of retired elderly motor vehicle passenger

$1,506,000– Jury verdict in one car accident case resulting in shoulder and ankle injuries to young man, where the victim’s previous lawyer recommended settling for $100,000.00

$1,050,000 – Verdict wrongful termination

$850,000 – Settlement against landlord in rape case

$750,000 – Settlements for boating accident in NJ

$738,000 – Settlement in intersectional collision case resulting in death of retired elderly motor vehicle passenger (amount represent limits of insurance policies)

$570,000 – Truck Accident

$300,000 – Car Accident Settlement

$250,000 – Property Damage Settlement

$210,000 – Bus accident settlement

$150,000 – Liquor liability settlement

$100,000  – New Jersey Arbitration Verdict

$100,000 – Uninsured Motorist Settlement


Significant verdicts for the firm include a nearly $3 million dollar verdict in Asta v. Mastropieri, a nearly $1 million dollar verdict in Bruno vs. WB Saunders Co., 882 F.2d 760 (3d Cir. Pa. 1989), 493 U.S. 1062 (U.S. 1990) (cert. denied), and numerous seven figures and one $10,000,000.00 confidential settlement. Unfortunately, many of these settlements are protected by confidentially agreements and cannot be described further.

On the defense side, we have successfully defended numerous matters to verdict in favor of the defense.

The firm also maintains a significant banking law practice representing banks, money order companies and other financial institutions. The firm is General Counsel to The Pennsylvania Check Cashing Industry. The firm achieved a benchmark appellate case decision in Merchants Exp. Money Order Co. v. Sun Nat. Bank, 374 N.J. Super. 556 (App.Div. 2005).

Recent Court Matters:

Gompers Successfully Defends Jeweler From Injury Claim
Read Details…

Gompers Firms Interviewed by Press Regarding its Successful Recoveries Regarding Success in Canazaro Matters.
Read Details…

Firm Wins Dismissal of Patient Abuse Claim Against Ancora Hospital Along With Cash Settlement.
Read Details…

Dismissed Employee Wins Reinstatement With Full Back Pay and Attorney Fees.
Read Details…

Federal Court Dismisses Corporate Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Claim.
Read Details…

Firm Wins Injunction Before The Third Circuit Court of Appeals Barring The State of New Jersey and Governor Chris Christie From Enforcing Confiscatory Amendments to State Escheat Laws.
Read Details…

Firm Wins Injunction Against State of New Jersey in Unfair Labor Practice Matter.
Read Details…

Gompers Firm Wins $70,000.00 in Back Pay and Attorney Fees for Wrongfully Suspended State Worker. In the Case of Cruz v. Ancora Psychiatric Hospital.
Read Details…